VALUE OF 99m Tc-ARCITUMOMAB SPECT CO-REGISTERED TO X-RAY CT FOR SUSPECTED METASTATIC BREAST CARCINOMA

 

Breast Cancer Research & Treatment 2001; 69: 237 – Poster 203

 

J. Rettig,  Arlington Cancer Center Arlington, TX

 

Background: Accurate disclosure of metastatic breast carcinoma directly effects patient evaluation and selection of therapy. When CT results are negative, reveal stable or equivocal findings despite rising serum CEA levels, further evaluation is warranted. CEA expression has been reported in the vast majority of breast carcinoma specimens although blood CEA levels seldom are elevated in patients with localized primary disease.

 

Objective: To determine the utility of x-ray Computed Tomography (CT) co-registered to nuclear medicine Single Photon Emission Tomography (SPECT) to detect metastatic breast carcinoma.

 

Methods: The study group consisted of fourteen patients with primary breast carcinoma staged no higher than T4bN2M0 who subsequently developed elevated serum CEA levels ranging from 6.5-820.0 ng/ml. Comparison CTs were obtained at most one month prior to the co-registration procedure. Samples for serum CEA assays were drawn 1-7 days prior to immunoscintigraphy. Prior to imaging, hot/cold fiduciary markers were affixed to anatomic reference points to facilitate co-registration. All patients were examined by CT and SPECT. Patients proceeded directly from the gamma camera to the spiral CT unit to ensure consistent placement of the markers. Whole body planar and SPECT images of the pelvis and abdomen were acquired 3-4 hours post infusion of 99mTc-arcitumomab (Immunomedics, Inc. Morris Plains, NJ). If needed, SPECT images of the chest were obtained 6-24 hours post infusion. Two patients had multiple immunoscintigrams and did not develop human anti-mouse antibodies (HAMA). The CTs were evaluated on their own. Areas in question on the CT studies were co-registered to the corresponding SPECT by alignment of the markers via a Voxel unit. The resultant co-registered study was reviewed directly from the computer screen in all three orthogonal planes and with full knowledge of all available clinical data.

 

Results: In positive CT studies with no interval change and elevated CEA levels, the co-registered images identified 15 additional sites of metastatic involvement. Positive uptake was found in all 7 lesions stable over 2 or more CTs. In a subset of 4 patients with CT findings of insufficient magnitude to be read as positive, the co-registered studies identified at least one additional lesion in 2 patients.

 

Conclusion: Co-registration of CT/SPECT using 99mTc-arcitumomab appears to be a valuable tool for the detection of metastatic breast carcinoma.

 

 

BACK